Mental Maps: The Cognitive Mapping of the Continent as an Object of Research of European History@Mental Maps@(ÜB)@freigabe

Introduction

In the context of the much-discussed "spatial turn" in the humanities and social sciences, there has been increased interest in the history of collective concepts of the subdivision of the European continent into geographical or historical macro-regions in recent years.¹ This expanding field of mental maps research in the cultural sciences includes, for example, research into the construction of Europe as an imagined historical and cultural space, as well as research into the "invention" and conceptualization of the "North", the "Balkans" or "Eastern Europe". However, the concept of the "mental map", which has been borrowed from cognitive psychology, does not represent a clearly defined research method or theory. The heuristic instruments employed in historical mental maps research are instead borrowed from more closely related areas of research, such as research into borders and stereotypes, discourse history, cartographic history, and the history of travel and of travel writing. The following article briefly outlines the concept of the "cognitive map" or "mental map", and explains the heuristic potential which it holds for historical research. A short overview of the state of mental maps research to date relating to Europe as a whole is followed by a discussion of the "invention" or construction of "Eastern Europe", which has been a particularly intensively discussed topic in this area of research.

Definition of the Concept of the Mental Map

The concept of the mental map, which has been adopted in the disciplines of geography, history, and cultural anthropology, originated in cognitive psychology. The term "cognitive map" was coined by the American psychologist Edward C. Tolman (1886–1959), who researched the sense of direction of rats and went on to discuss the representation of spatial knowledge in the human brain.² Subsequently, developments in the areas of geography and urban planning contributed to the concept of the cognitive map or mental map becoming a paradigm for interdisciplinary research on the spatial orientation capacity of humans in the 1960s.³

In the relevant academic literature, the abstract term "cognitive mapping" refers to those cognitive or mental abilities "that enable us to collect, organize, store, recall, and manipulate information about the spatial environment."⁴ According to this definition, cognitive maps are representations of spatial knowledge in the human brain. These maps can be described as subjective understandings of spatial reality which are determined by the individual's position, perspective, and range of movement. They represent the world as it appears to the respective observer.⁵ A cognitive map helps the human to get his bearings in his spatial environment. It "reflects the world as some person believes it to be; it need not be correct. In fact, distortions are highly likely."⁶

While "cognitive map" (or "cognitive mapping") has become the standard term in psychological research, the concept of the "mental map" ("mental mapping") has become more common in the discipline of geography.⁷ However, the description of mental representations of spatial structures as "maps" is not entirely uncontroversial.⁸ Thus, other terms are also used in the area of orientation research, such as "environmental images",⁹ "spatial representations", "topological schemata", and many others.¹⁰ However, the term "mental map" has become fairly standard in historical research on collective concepts of geographical and historical macro-regions.¹¹

The Concept of Mental Maps in Historical Research

"Classical" mental maps research had already pointed to the fact that, in addition to "locational information" regarding position and direction, cognitive maps contain information on the "qualitative characteristics" of the represented object.¹² "Cognitive maps are not just a set of spatial mental structures denoting relative position, they contain attributive values and meanings."¹³ This observation regarding cognitive maps in general is particularly relevant to the representations of spaces which have been the object of inquiry of historical mental maps research for some time. For example, when the genesis and potency of Western concepts of the Balkans are investigated, particular attention is paid to the "attributive values and meanings" that are connected with these spatial concepts.¹⁴

The normative charge of cognitive maps is one of the reasons why the concept of "mental maps" lends itself so readily to historical inquiry.¹⁵ However, while cognitive psychology and geographical research primarily concentrate on the role that cognitive maps play in the individual's spatial orientation, mental maps research in the cultural sciences and history has a different aim. In the case of the latter, the focus is on how personal concepts of space are influenced by (world)views which are transferred culturally, and how shared collective representations of an – experienced or imagined – spatial environment in turn affect processes of cultural group formation and identity formation. While the influence of cultural, social, and gender-specific factors on an individual's representation of space is now also acknowledged in cognitive psychological research, the issue of the influence of collective concepts of space on historical processes of group formation goes beyond "classical" mental maps research.¹⁶ For example, when in historical studies the "invention of Eastern Europe"¹⁷ is being investigated, the primary aim is not to compare these concepts of space against an "objective reality". Instead, the representations of the spatial environment which are manifested in the concept of "Eastern Europe" are treated as a historical "reality" in their own right, and an effort is made to identify the degree to which these representations influenced the actions of historical actors.

While "classical" and historical mental maps research have some important theoretical assumptions in common, they differ in particular with regard to their methodological approaches. Whereas in psychology and geography mental maps research primarily investigates cognitive representations of individual "environments" (i.e., proximate spaces such as routes to work and school, city districts, etc.), historical mental maps research discusses representations of spatial-social contexts, "which extend far beyond the limits of the space experienced by the individual" (such as "Europe", "the West", "the Orient", etc.).¹⁸ Additionally, cognitive psychologists have the option of questioning their subjects about their individual concepts of space and of having them draw physical maps of experienced and imagined spaces, while historians must depend on surviving documents in order to reconstruct the concepts of space of a particular person or group. These sources include geographical and cultural-historical descriptions of countries (chorographies), travel accounts, and travel guides, as well as the reports of correspondents from abroad, maps, caricatures, and other visual material, though historical mental maps research has in the past primarily focused on textual sources. This focus on the history of discourses has led to the criticism that historical mental maps research neglects visual source material and concentrates on reconstructing the mental maps of social elites.¹⁹ However, more recently there has been increased interest in maps as a source for the reconstruction of spatial concepts of the past in historical research.²⁰

The extent to which historians, by focusing on the history of particular historical macro-regions, have contributed and continue to contribute to the reification of traditional spatial concepts is an open question. Regional subdisciplines of history, such as Eastern European History, have in the past often endeavoured to depict their own object of investigation as an "objective" historical reality, not least in order to justify their existence as an independent university subject.²¹ For example, during the lively debate in the late 1990s about the construction of the Western image of the Balkans, it was suggested that contemporary historical research on Southeastern Europe stands in a long tradition of tendentious Western discourses on the region, and that regional historical studies contribute to the consolidation of stereotypical spatial concepts.²² In response to this criticism, it was asserted that considering divergent regional processes of development is a central task of historical research, and that the analysis of structural differences between various European regions should not be equated with a normative Western discourse on "Balkanism".²³

This debate is ultimately connected with the question of to what extent historians are able to make value-free statements about difference and the borders of "objective" historical structures in European history without getting themselves caught up in traditional mental maps and perpetuating the latter.²⁴ In the discussion about the Western concept of Southeastern Europe / the Balkans, there was ultimately a degree of convergence between the opposing standpoints. While the one side acknowledged that it is necessary to consider the potency of mental maps in historical studies as well, the other side conceded that it is also possible to explain structural differences in present-day cultural and political developments in Europe by looking at the distinctive "historical inheritance" or "legacy" of the respective historical regions.²⁵

Case study: "Eastern Europe" as an Object of Historical Mental Maps Research

There is so much research literature on the history of mental maps of Europe and of its macro-regions, that it is difficult to retain an overview. There has been intensive research into both the history of Europe as an imagined and "invented" cultural space and the history of discourses and perceptions of the main European macro-regions, such as Southern Europe, Western Europe, Northern Europe / Scandinavia, Central Europe / East-Central Europe, Southeastern Europe / the Balkans, and Eastern Europe.²⁶ The following sections give a brief overview of the research to date on an important European macro-region: "Eastern Europe".

Where is "Eastern Europe"?

When one attempts to locate "Eastern Europe" on mental maps of the European continent, one is quickly confronted with the problem that the corresponding terms (Osteuropa, "Eastern Europe", L' Europe orientale, vostochnaia Evropa, Europa wschodnia, etc.) are not as broadly used or as strongly anchored in some European languages as in others, and, additionally, they refer to a space that is often delineated differently. For example, while the current edition of the German Brockhaus encyclopedia contains a separate entry entitled Osteuropa, there is no entry for "Eastern Europe" in the Encyclopedia Britannica.²⁷ According to the Brockhaus, "Im allgemeinen geographischen Sprachgebrauch" Osteuropa encompasses the "Länder im Osten Europas, also Litauen, Lettland, Estland, Weißrussland, Moldova, die Ukraine und der europäische Teil Russlands". However, the entry also stresses that the usual German concept of Osteuropa encompasses all "Gebiete östlich der (historischen) deutschen Sprachgrenze ohne regionale oder ethnische Differenzierung".²⁸

According to the definition of the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSTATS), "Eastern Europe" comprises the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova, as well as Bulgaria, Rumania, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia.²⁹ By contrast, the World Factbook of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) assigns the Russian Federation to "Central Asia", while it includes Ukraine and Belarus in "Europe".³⁰ Conversely, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, and Moldova are described as "other European countries" in the established usage of the EU administration.³¹

This list, which could be extended ad infinitum, demonstrates the extent to which the mental maps in society are influenced by the political standpoint and disciplinary perspective of the respective observer. Even within specialist regional disciplines such as Eastern European History, there is by no means a clear consensus on the geographical and historical/structural borders of the region under investigation. While historians in the English-speaking world who specialize in "Eastern Europe" claim expertise in the history of countries such as Poland, the Czech Republic, Hungary, etc., Eastern European Studies in German-speaking countries usually assigns these countries to the historical region of "Ostmitteleuropa" (East-Central Europe). Russia or the Soviet Union (and in some cases the entire eastern Slavic and Orthodox space), on the other hand, are viewed as "Osteuropa im engeren Sinne" (Eastern Europe in the narrower sense).³² The picture described here becomes even more complicated and confusing if one takes into account the dimension of legacy and longue durée, that is, the history of the development of the (Western) concept of "Eastern Europe". In many countries, the mental maps of the Cold War continue to have a profound effect and "Eastern Europe" continues to be equated with the "Eastern Bloc".

An analysis of the concept of "Eastern Europe" in the present day shows that it is primarily used to refer to an alterity, an "other", a "foreign" macro-region. This region is vaguely described as lying "to the east" of "one's own" territory and often has negative connotations. While in the German language the term "Osteuropa" generally refers to a political and cultural space which begins at the Oder-Neisse line or beyond the Bohemian Forest which lies between Germany, Austria, and the Czech Republic,³³ Poles, Czechs, and Hungarians usually define themselves as belonging to (East-) Central Europe, instead of Eastern Europe. In Ukraine and Belarus, there is still a commonly held view that these countries are not situated in Eastern Europe, but lie between Western and Eastern Europe.³⁴ Further to the east, Russia has for centuries been intensively debating its own relationship with the "West" (zapad). However, in these debates Russia is not described as belonging to "Eastern Europe".³⁵ In Russian, the term "east" (vostok) traditionally refers to the "Orient".³⁶ Since the 19th century, Russian mental maps have defined Russia as either a cultural-spatial entity of its own (witness, for example, the debate about "Russia and Europe"³⁷) or as part of the Orthodox (pravoslavnii) or Slavic cultural region (according to, for example, the "Slavophil" antecedents of Pan-Slavism). During the 20th century, the territory was additionally described as a part of "Eurasia" or the "progressive (socialist) world".³⁸ "Eastern Europe" is perhaps the only European macro-region which is deeply rooted in the mental maps of many people, even though there are few people who accept that this "foreign designation" refers to them.³⁹ Eastern Europe is thus a macro-region without "Eastern Europeans". Restaurants which describe themselves as serving "Eastern European cuisine", for example in Poland, Hungary, or Russia, are thus peculiarities.

On the History of the Western Concept of "Eastern Europe"

The convention of mentally dividing Europe into a western half and an eastern half is a relatively recent phenomenon in historical terms. It was not until around 1800 that the understanding of the world which emerged in classical antiquity and which divided the continent into a "civilized" south and a "barbarian" north declined in importance.⁴⁰ For example, Russia was considered a "Nordic" country in the geographical understanding of the German, English, and French-speaking territories right up to the beginning of the 19th century. Thus, researchers demonstrated as early as the mid-1980s that the Russian Empire had moved from "northern" to "eastern" Europe on Western mental maps during the first third of the 19th century.⁴¹ This process not only represented a terminological transformation. It also reflected "the change in the political-ideological worldview of large parts of Europe".⁴²

After the Congress of Vienna – this narrative continues – Russia ascended to the status of guarantor of the ancien régimes and of anti-revolutionary "gendarme" of Europe, a development which was viewed with suspicion particularly in liberal circles in western Europe.⁴³ Negative attributes which had previously been applied to the peoples of the "East" in the context of the Western discourse on the "Orient" also occurred with increasing frequency in descriptions of Russia from the early 19th century onward. References to the "barbarian", "wild", and "half-Asiatic" character of the Russian Empire strengthened the perception of Russia as an "eastern" country. As the Russian Empire ruled large parts of eastern central Europe up to 1917, the terms "Russia" and "Eastern Europe" were used synonymously in western European languages up to the end of the First World War.

The terms "North" and "Northern Europe" were also increasingly applied exclusively to the Scandinavian countries from the early-19th century onward, due in part to Germanic philology and ancient studies, and the "Scandinavianism" movement in the second half of the 19th century. This also contributed to shifts in European mental maps. At the same time, the emergence of the study of linguistics and literature as separate disciplines saw the area of dispersal of the Slavic languages being defined as a separate cultural-spatial entity, a concept which remains central to the Western concept of "Eastern Europe" to the present day.

The mental ascription of the Russian Empire to "Eastern Europe" can be dated to the first third of the 19th century by means of discourse-historical analysis. However, it was also a continuation of older space-related discourses and concepts. For example, from Roman antiquity onward, Orthodox Christians had been traditionally assigned to the world of the nationes christianorum orientalium, that is, the non-Latin "Oriental" "(Eastern) Church" (ecclesia orientalis).⁴⁴ From this perspective, Russia (i.e., the Kievan Rus) had been a part of the "eastern" Christian world ever since its conversion to Christianity under Vladimir I Sviatoslavich (956–1015), known as Saint Vladimir, in the 10th century. The tendency to ascribe what were considered to be "northern attributes" – "barbarian character" and "hordes" – to Russia and Western fears of a "flood" from that territory also have a longer history, though it is often assumed that this trend emerged during the genesis of our present-day concept of "Eastern Europe". Since the early modern period and the "rediscovery" of the Russian Empire by travellers and diplomats like Sigmund von Herberstein (1486–1566)[] and Adam Olearius (ca. 1603–1671)[], references to the "barbarian" and "half-Asiatic" character of Russia and its inhabitants have been among the most persistent stereotypes of the Western concept of Russia.⁴⁵ For this reason, it seems useful and reasonable to look for the roots of present-day concepts of "Eastern Europe" in a time when the term "Eastern Europe" had not yet emerged in the European languages.

The assumption of Larry Wolff that the emergence of the present-day Western concept of "Eastern Europe" dates back to the era of the Enlightenment, i.e. the late 18th century, is in the meantime widespread and influential.⁴⁶ According to this argument, French philosophers, travellers, and polymaths in particular had re-ordered the mental maps of the continent during this period, and had replaced the traditional division of Europe into "south" and "north" with the picture of a cultural space divided into a western and an eastern half. According to this view, the central criterion of assignment was not the geographical location of the country, but the position of the society on a temporal axis based on an idealized concept of historical "progress". This has given rise to the controversial thesis that the division of Europe along the line of the Iron Curtain in the 20th century was to a degree preordained by the discourse of the Western Enlightenment. Those countries which subsequently belonged to the "Eastern Bloc", that is, to the political space of "Eastern Europe", had – the argument goes – already been perceived and described by philosophers in the 18th century as a spatial entity with numerous common characteristics.⁴⁷

In travel literature and historiography, in geographical descriptions and first-hand accounts of the "enlightened" 18th century – the theory continues – "Eastern Europe" was invented as a foil to contrast with, and differentiate from, an imagined, progressive "West". In contrast to the idealized bastion of "civilisation" which they perceived Western Europe to be (so the argument continues), the western scholars perceived and depicted "Eastern Europe" as relatively underdeveloped. Unlike the "Orient", which from the Western perspective was viewed as a space of "permanent" backwardness, "Eastern Europe" was viewed by the philosophers as at least having the capacity to develop. From the western perspective, "Eastern Europe" was a classic space of transition – from "barbarianism" to "civilisation", from the timeless "Orient" to the progressive "West".⁴⁸ Signs of "cultivated" life in eastern Europe were simply discounted by Western observers as superficial phenomena – the argument continues – as they believed that the "civilisation" and "Enlightenment" of the eastern half of the continent had only just begun.

Thus, great significance is attributed to the "invention" of "Eastern Europe" by travellers and thinkers of the Enlightenment period. The Western discourse on "Eastern Europe" is understood similar to Edward Said's (1935–2003) description of "Orientalism" as a discourse of superiority and dominance, which prepared the way for subsequent plans for military, political, and economic conquest and colonisation.⁴⁹ The cognitive mapping of eastern Europe by western Enlightenment thinkers must – according to this argument – even be interpreted as the cognitive preparation for the territorial expansion of western powers into eastern Europe, which resulted, for example, in the Partitions of Poland, the conquest of Russia by Napoleon Bonaparte (1769–1821) and the Ostraumpolitik of National Socialist Germany.⁵⁰ Thus, according to the derived argument, mental maps are not only very persistent. They also play a very significant role in directing the actions of states and individuals, and this function should be taken seriously by historical research.

The "Invention" of "Eastern Europe" in Discussion

This thesis of the "invention" of "Eastern Europe" during the Enlightenment is not without its critics in the academic literature. Criticism points out – among other things – that this concept includes countries and regions in a concept of "Eastern Europe", even though this term does not actually appear in the historical sources from the Enlightenment period.⁵¹ It has also been pointed out that this analysis only cites references to countries which were considered part of "Eastern Europe" in the 20th century. This gives rise to the accusation that concepts of space have been projected back into the 18th century from the present.⁵² For example, comparative studies of travel accounts on Poland and France by German travellers in the late 18th and early 19th centuries have shown that aspects of the (supposed) Western discourse on "Eastern Europe", such as references to its relative "backwardness", are also contained in contemporary travel accounts describing rural France.⁵³ It has also been repeatedly pointed out that the "invention" of "Eastern Europe" must not be viewed as being purely a consequence of Western descriptions of the "other ", and the role of the people in eastern Europe in this process of mental mapping must be given due consideration.⁵⁴ Another study which deals with the history of the French discourse on "Eastern Europe" from the mid-18th century to the late 19th century completely calls into question the thesis of the "invention" of "Eastern Europe" in the period of the Enlightenment, and dates the "discursive formation" of "Euro-Orientalism" to the 1870s.⁵⁵

Regardless of this criticism, the theory of the "invention" of "Eastern Europe" by the philosophers of the 18th century has inspired and promoted historical research into concepts of space in modern European history⁵⁶ and can be viewed as one of the most important early studies of the history of cognitive maps of Europe. For future studies, it would seem particularly useful

1. to investigate the dialogical mutual relationship between different historical spatial concepts such as "Eastern Europe" and "the West", "Eastern Central Europe", "the Balkans", etc.,
2. to investigate the contribution of the various academic disciplines (geography, history, anthropology, literature studies, etc.) to the respective discourses on space, and
3. to analyse the construction of the various perceptions of space as the result of a "dialogue" between discourses of self-description and description of the "other".⁵⁷

Conclusion

The concept of mental mapping can now be viewed as an established paradigm of a direction in historical research which is interested in the history of collective concepts of the spatial structuring of the world and its constituent regions. With the help of the concept of the mental map, which has been borrowed from cognitive psychology and geography, it is possible to describe and investigate individual and collective representations of the experienced and imagined spatial environment. Historical research on the history of the mental mapping of Europe and its constituent spaces continues the work done in older research on travel and stereotypes, as well as research on the history of cartography and the history of science.

The spatial metaphor of the mental map would appear to contain further potential for new insights in a number of respects. For example, mental maps research could investigate the extent to which collective concepts of European macro-regions really exhibit the characteristics of a "map" by paying more attention to historical and geographical map material. The question of the power of shared collective concepts of space to influence action also remains to be answered. For example, concrete research is required to ascertain the extent to which Napoleon was actually guided by the emerging concept of "Eastern Europe" of the Enlightenment period while he was planning his Russian campaign in 1812. The acknowledgement of the historical conditionality of their own chosen spatial categories presents a particular challenge for subdisciplines with a regional focus, and this challenge must be kept in mind at all times during the research process.

Frithjof Benjamin Schenk

Appendix

Sources

Bibliographisches Institut & F. A. Brockhaus AG (ed.): "Osteuropa", in: Brockhaus: Enzyklopädie in 30 Bänden 20 (2006), 21st ed., Leipzig et al. 2006, pp. 584f.

Central Intelligence Agency (ed.): Central Asia, in: Central Intelligence Agency (ed.): The World Factbook, Washington 2012.

Encyclopædia Britannica (ed.): Britannica Online Encyclopedia, London et al. 2012. URL: http://www.britannica.com/ [2021-03-22]

European Union (ed.): External Actions, Brussels 2012.

Prochorov, Aleksandr M. (ed.): "Vostok", in: Bolshaia Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia 5 (1971), 3rd edition, Moscow et al. 1971.

Thunmann, Johann Erich: Untersuchungen über die Geschichte der östlichen europäischen Völker, Leipzig 1774.

United Nations Statistics Division (ed.): Composition of Macro Geographical (Continental) Regions, Geographical Sub-Regions, and Selected Economic and Other Groupings, New York 2012. URL: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/m49/m49regin.htm#europe [2021-03-22]

Online source

Mishkova, Diana / Trencsenyi, Balazs (eds.): European Regions and Boundaries: A Conceptual History, published by the Centre for Advances Studies in Sofia. URL: https://regions.cas.bg/ [2024-02-22]

Literature

Adamovsky, Ezequiel: Euro-Orientalism: Liberal Ideology and the Image of Russia in France (c. 1740–1880), Oxford et al. 2006.

Adamovsky, Ezequiel: Euro-Orientalism and the Making of the Concept of Eastern Europe in France, 1810–1880, in: Journal of Modern History 77,3 (2005), pp. 591–628. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497718 / URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/497718 [2021-03-22]

Arnason, Johann P.: Historians in Search of Borders: Mapping the European East, in: Themenportal Europäische Geschichte (2006). URL: http://www.europa.clio-online.de/2006/Article=165 [2021-03-22]

Bachmann-Medick, Doris: Cultural Turns: Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften, Reinbek 2006. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402988 [2021-03-22]

Barth-Scalmani, Gunda / Scharr, Kurt: Mental Maps historischer Reiseführer: Zur touristischen Verdichtung von Kulturräumen in den Alpen am Beispiel der Brennerroute, in: Histoire des Alpes, Storia delle Alpi, Geschichte der Alpen 9 (2004), pp. 203–224.

Bassin, Mark: Classical Eurasianism and the Geopolitics of Russian Identity. URL: https://cesran.org/classical-eurasianism-and-the-geopolitics-of-russian-identity.html [2021-03-22]

Bassin, Mark: Eurasianism "Classical" and "Neo": The Lines of Continuity, in: Slavic Eurasian Studies 17 (2008), pp. 279–294. URL: https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/coe21/publish/no17_ses/contents.html [2021-03-22]

Bernhardt, Petra: Einbildung und Wandel der Raumkategorie "Osten" seit 1989: Werbebilder als soziale Indikatoren, in: Image 10 (2009). URL: http://www.gib.uni-tuebingen.de/image/ausgaben-3 [2021-03-22]

Bethke, Carl: Von der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung des Historikers: Das Südosteuropa der 1990er Jahre im Spiegel der Veröffentlichungen von Holm Sundhaussen, in: Ulf Brunnbauer et al. (eds.): Schnittstellen: Gesellschaft, Nation, Konflikt und Erinnerung in Südosteuropa: Festschrift für Holm Sundhaussen zum 65. Geburtstag, Munich 2007, pp. 15–24.

Bisaha, Nancy: Creating East and West: Renaissance Humanists and the Ottoman Turks, Philadelphia 2004. URL: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812201291 [2021-03-22]

Brunnbauer, Ulf: "Europa" und der "Balkan": Fremd und Selbstzuschreibungen, Vorlesung am Osteuropa-Institut der Freien Universität, Berlin 2005.

Brunnbauer, Ulf: Europa und sein Balkan: Ein Essay über die Macht der Vorstellung, in: Uwe Hinrichs (ed.): Handbuch der Eurolinguistik, Wiesbaden 2010 (Slavistische Studienbücher 20), pp. 91–109.

Casey, Steven et al. (eds.): Mental Maps in the Early Cold War Era: 1945–68, Basingstoke et al. 2011. URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306066 [2021-03-22]

Casey, Steven et al. (eds.): Mental Maps in the Era of the Two World Wars, Houndmills 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227606 [2021-03-22]

Cilauro, Santo: Molwanien: Land des schadhaften Lächelns, 5th ed., Munich 2005.

Confino, Michael: Re-Inventing the Enlightenment: Western Images of Eastern Realities in the Eighteenth Century, in: Canadian Slavonic Papers 36,3–4 (1994), pp. 505–522. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40869682 / URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00085006.1994.11092071 [2021-03-22]

Conrad, Christoph (ed.): Mental Maps, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28,3 (2002), pp. 339–514. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40005724 / URL: https://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/toc/?PID=PPN483856525_0028 [2021-03-22]

Danilevskij, Nikolaj Jakovlevič: Russland und Europa: Eine Untersuchung über die kulturellen und politischen Beziehungen der slawischen zur germanisch-romanischen Welt, transl. and with a foreword by Karl Nötzel, Osnabrück 1965.

Dipper, Christof et al. (eds.): Kartenwelten: der Raum und seine Repräsentation in der Neuzeit, Darmstadt 2006.

Döring, Jörg et al. (eds.): Spatial Turn: Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, Bielefeld 2008. URL: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839406830 [2021-03-22]

Downs, Roger M. / Stea, David: Kognitive Karten: Die Welt in unseren Köpfen, New York 1982 (English original: Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping, New York 1977).

Downs, Roger M. et al.: Raum als kognitives und sprachliches Problem, in: Harro Schweizer (ed.): Sprache und Raum: psychologische und linguistische Aspekte der Aneignung und Verarbeitung von Räumlichkeit: ein Arbeitsbuch für das Lehren von Forschung, Stuttgart 1985, pp. 17–64.

Drace-Francis, Alex: A Provincial Imperialist and a Curious Account of Walachia: Ignaz von Born, in: European History Quarterly 36,1 (2006), pp. 61–89. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265691406059612 [2021-03-22]

Drace-Francis, Alex: Towards a Natural History of East European Travel Writing, in: Wendy Bracewell et al. (eds.): Under Eastern Eyes: A Comparative Introduction to East European Travel Writing on Europe, Budapest 2008, pp. 1–26. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7829/j.ctv10tq5jm.4 [2021-03-15]

Dupcsik, Csaba: Postcolonial Studies and the Inventing of Eastern Europe, in: East Central Europe 26 (1999), pp. 1–14. URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/187633099X00013 [2021-03-22]

Faraldo, José M. et al. (eds.): Europa im Ostblock: Vorstellungen und Diskurse (1945–1991), Cologne 2008 (Zeithistorische Studien 44).

Gebhard, Gunther et al. (eds.): Das Prinzip "Osten": Geschichte und Gegenwart eines symbolischen Raums, Bielefeld 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839415641 [2021-03-22]

Gotthard, Axel: Wohin führt uns der "Spatial turn"? Über mögliche Gründe, Chancen und Grenzen einer neuerdings diskutierten historiographischen Wende, in: Wolfgang Wüst et al. (eds.): Mikro – Meso – Makro: Regionenforschung im Aufbruch, Erlangen 2005, pp. 15–49.

Gould, Peter / White, Rodney: Mental Maps, 2nd ed., Boston 1992.

Götz, Norbert et al. (eds.): Die Ordnung des Raums: Mentale Landkarten in der Ostseeregion, Berlin 2006.

Happel, Jörn et al. (eds.): Osteuropa kartiert – Mapping Eastern Europe, Berlin et al. 2010.

Hard, Gerhard: Der spatial turn von der Geographie her beobachtet, in: Jörg Döring et al. (eds.): Spatial turn: Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, Bielefeld 2008, pp. 263–315. URL: https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839406830-011 [2021-03-22]

Hartmann, Angelika: Konzepte und Transformationen der Trias "Mental Maps, Raum und Erinnerung", in: Sabine Damir-Geilsdorf et al. (eds.): Mental Maps – Raum – Erinnerung: Kulturwissenschaftliche Zugänge zum Verhältnis von Raum und Erinnerung, Münster 2005 (Kulturwissenschaft: Forschung und Wissenschaft 1), pp. 3–21.

Hösch, Edgar: Samuel Huntington und die orthodoxe Welt, in: Ulf Brunnbauer (ed.): Schnittstellen: Gesellschaft, Nation, Konflikt und Erinnerung in Südosteuropa: Festschrift für Holm Sundhaussen zum 65. Geburtstag, Munich 2007, pp. 381–400.

Jezernik, Božidar: Wild Europe: The Balkans in the Gaze of Western Travellers, London 2004.

Johnston, R.J.: Mental Maps of the City: Suburban Preference Patterns, in: Environment and Planning 3 (1971), pp. 63–72. URL: https://doi.org/10.1068/a030063 [2021-03-22]

Jordan, Peter: Großgliederung Europas nach kulturräumlichen Kriterien, in: Europa Regional 13,4 (2005), pp. 162–173. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48072-8 [2021-03-22]

Jureit, Ulrike: Das Ordnen von Räumen: Territorium und Lebensraum im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, Hamburg 2012.

Kamusella, Tomasz: School Historical Atlases as Instruments of Nation-State Making and Maintenance: A Remark on the Invisibility of Ideology in Popular Education, in: Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society 2 (2010). URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43049343 [2021-03-22]

Kappeler, Andreas: Osteuropäische Geschichte, in: Michael Maurer (eds.): Aufriß der Historischen Wissenschaften, vol. 2: Räume, Stuttgart 2001, pp. 198–265.

Kaser, Karl et al. (eds.): Europa und die Grenzen im Kopf, Klagenfurt 2003 (Wieser Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens 11).

Koller, Christophe et al. (eds.): Karten, Kartographie und Geschichte: Von der Visualisierung der Macht zur Macht der Visualisierung, Zürich 2010.

Kitchin, Robert M.: Cognitive Maps: What Are They and Why Study Them?, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology 14 (1994), pp. 1–19. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X [2021-03-22]

Kitchin, Robert M. / Blades, Mark: The Cognition of Geographic Space, London 2001.

Kivelson, Valerie A.: Cartographies of Tsardom: The Land and its Meanings in Seventeenth-Century Russia, Ithaca 2006.

Klug, Ekkehard: Das "asiatische" Russland: Über die Entstehung eines europäischen Vorurteils, in: Historische Zeitschrift 245 (1987), pp. 265–289. URL: https://doi.org/10.1524/hzhz.1987.245.jg.265 / URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27625824 [2021-03-22]

Langenohl, Andreas: Mental maps, Raum und Erinnerung: Zur kultursoziologischen Erschließung eines transdisziplinären Konzepts, in: Sabine Damir-Geilsdorf et al. (eds.): Mental Maps, Münster 2005 (Kulturwissenschaft: Forschung und Wissenschaft 1) pp. 51–69.

Lemberg, Hans: Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs im 19. Jahrhundert: Vom "Norden" zum "Osten" Europas, in: Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 33,1 (1985), pp. 48–91. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41046924 / URL: http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/bsb00003833/image_56 [2021-03-22]

Lewis, Martin W. / Wigen, Kären E.: The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Metageography, Berkeley 1997. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pnv6t [2021-03-22]

Liulevicius, Vejas Gabriel: The German Myth of the East: 1800 to the Present, Oxford 2009. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199546312.001.0001 [2021-03-22]

Lorenz, Dagmar (ed.): Konzept Osteuropa: Der "Osten" als Konstrukt der Fremd- und Eigenbestimmung in deutschsprachigen Texten des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts, Würzburg 2011.

Lotz, Christian: Die anspruchsvollen Karten: Polnische, ost- und westdeutsche Auslandsrepräsentationen und der Streit um die Oder-Neiße-Grenze (1945–1972), Magdeburg 2011 (Studien des Leipziger Kreises 10).

Lynch, Kevin A.: The Image of the City, Cambridge 1960.

Martin, Thomas (ed.): The French Colonial Mind, Lincoln 2011 (France Overseas: Studies in Empire and Decolonization), vol. 1: Mental Maps of Empire and Colonial Encounters.

Maxwell, Alexander: Introduction: Bridges and Bulwarks: A Historiographic Overview of East-West Discourses, in: Maxwell, Alexander (ed.): The East-West Discourse: Symbolic Geography and its Consequences, Oxford 2011 (Nationalisms Across the Globe 8), pp. 1–32.

Mervaud, Michel / Roberti, Jean-Claude: Une infinie brutalité: L'image de la Russie dans la France des XVIe et XVIIe siècles, Paris 1991 (Cultures et sociétés de l'Est 15).

Müller, Dietmar: Southeastern Europe as Historical Macro-Region, in: European Review of History 10,2 (2003), pp. 393–408. URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350748032000140868 [2021-03-22]

Neumann, Iver B.: Russia and the Idea of Europe: A Study in Identity and International Relations, London 1996 (The New International Relations). URL: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646336  [2021-03-18]

Neumann, Iver B.: Uses of the Other: "The East" in European Identity Formation, Manchester 1999 (Borderlines 9). URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv1zn [2021-03-22]

Orlinski, Wojciech: Ex oriente horror: Osteuropa-Stereotypen in der Populärkultur, in: Transit: Europäische Revue 31 (2006), pp. 132–152. URL: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=884006 [2021-03-22]

Osterhammel, Jürgen: Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Munich 2009 (Historische Bibliothek der Gerda Henkel Stiftung).

Poe, Marshal T.: "A People Born to Slavery": Russia in Early Modern European Ethnographs: 1476–1748, Ithaca 2000 (Studies of the Harriman Institute).

Petronis, Vytautas: Constructing Lithuania: Ethnic Mapping in Tsarist Russia, ca. 1800–1914, Stockholm 2007 (Stockholm Studies in History 91).

Portugali, Juval: Introduction, in: Juval Portugali: The Construction of Cognitive Maps, Dordrecht 1996 (The GeoJournal Library 32), S. 1–7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33485-1_1 [2021-03-22]

Said, Edward: Orientalism, New York 1979.

Schelting, Alexander von: Russland und Europa im russischen Geschichtsdenken: Auf der Suche nach der historischen Identität, edited and with an afterword by Christiane Uhlig, Bietigheim-Bissingen 1997.

Schenk, Frithjof Benjamin: The Historical Regions of Europe: Real or Invented? Some Remarks on Historical Comparison and Mental Mapping, in: Frithjof Benjamin Schenk (Hg.): Beyond the Nation: Writing European History Today, St. Petersburg 2004 (Working Papers des Zentrums für Deutschland und Europastudien 1).

Schenk, Frithjof Benjamin: Mental Maps: Die Konstruktion von geographischen Räumen in Europa seit der Aufklärung: Literaturbericht, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002), pp. 493–514. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40186205 / URL: http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=PPN483856525_0028|log32 [2021-03-22]

Schlögel, Karl: Im Raume lesen wir die Zeit: Über Zivilisationsgeschichte und Geopolitik, Munich 2003.

Schraut, Sylvia: Kartierte Nationalgeschichte: Geschichtsatlanten im internationalen Vergleich: 1860–1960, Frankfurt 2011.

Schulze Wessel, Martin: "Westen; Okzident", in: Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie 12 (2004), cols. 667–672.

Stråth, Bo: Karten - Repräsentationen Europas aus vier Jahrhunderten, in: Themenportal Europäische Geschichte (2007). URL: http://www.europa.clio-online.de/2007/Article=151 [2021-03-22]

Struck, Bernhard: Vom historisch-klimatischen Raum zum politischen Raum: Europas mentale Geografien um 1800, in: Themenportal Europäische Geschichte (2007). URL: http://www.europa.clio-online.de/2007/Article=186 [2021-03-22]

Struck, Bernhard: Nicht West, nicht Ost: Frankreich und Polen in der Wahrnehmung deutscher Reisender zwischen 1750 und 1850, Göttingen 2006.

Sundhaussen, Holm: Der Balkan: Ein Plädoyer für Differenz, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 29 (2003), pp. 642–658. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40186187 / URL: http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=PPN483856525_0029|log35 [2021-03-22]

Sundhaussen, Holm: Europa balcanica: Der Balkan als historischer Raum Europas, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 25 (1999), pp. 626–653. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40185964 / URL: http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=PPN483856525_0025|log53 [2021-03-22]

Sundhaussen, Holm / Schmitt, Jens Oliver: Die Wiederentdeckung des Raumes: Über Nutzen und Nachteil von Geschichtsregionen, in: Konrad Clewing et al. (eds.): Südosteuropa: Von moderner Vielfalt und nationalstaatlicher Vereinheitlichung: Festschrift Edgar Hösch, Munich 2005, pp. 13–33.

Thum, Gregor: "Europa" im Ostblock: Weiße Flecken in der Geschichte der europäischen Integration, in: Zeithistorische Forschungen 1,3 (2003), pp. 379–395. URL: https://doi.org/10.14765/zzf.dok-2046 [2021-03-22]

Thum, Gregor (ed.): Traumland Osten: Deutsche Bilder vom östlichen Europa im 20. Jahrhundert, Göttingen 2006. URL: http://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00065900-1 [2021-03-22]

Todorova, Maria: Spacing Europe: What is a Historical Region?, in: East Central Europe – L'Europe du Centre-Est: Eine wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift 32,1–2 (2005), pp. 59–78. URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763308-90001032 / URL: https://doi.org/10.1163/18763308-90001032 [2021-03-22]

Todorova, Maria: Historische Vermächtnisse als Analysekategorie: Der Fall Südosteuropa, in: Karl Kaser et al. (eds.): Europa und die Grenzen im Kopf, Klagenfurt 2003 (Wieser Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens 11), pp. 227–252.

Todorova, Maria: Der Balkan als Analysekategorie: Grenzen, Raum, Zeit, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002), pp. 470–492.

Todorova, Maria: Die Erfindung des Balkans: Europas bequemes Vorurteil, Darmstadt 1998.

Tolman, Edward C.: Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men, in: Psychological Review 55 (1948), pp. 189–208. URL: http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Tolman/Maps/maps.htm [2021-03-22]

Torma, Franziska: Turkestan Expeditionen: Zur Kulturgeschichte deutscher Forschungsreisen nach Mittelasien (1890–1930), Bielefeld 2011 (1800–2000: Kulturgeschichten der Moderne 5), pp. 45–51. URL: https://doi.org/10.14361/transcript.9783839414491 [2021-03-22]

Troebst, Stefan: "Historical Meso-Region": A Concept in Cultural Studies and Historiography, in: European History Online (EGO), published by the Leibniz Institute of European History (IEG), Mainz 2012-03-06. URL: http://www.ieg-ego.eu/troebsts-2010-en URN: urn:nbn:de:0159-2011120508 [2021-03-22]

Tschižewskij, Dmitrij et al. (eds.): Europa und Russland: Texte zum Problem des westeuropäischen und russischen Selbstverständnisses, Darmstadt 1959.

Wagner, Kirsten: Kognitiver Raum: Orientierung – Mental Maps – Datenverwaltung, in: Stephan Günzel (ed.): Raum: Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, Stuttgart 2010, pp. 234–249. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05326-8 [2021-03-22]

Wendland, Anna Veronika: Wie wir die Karten lesen: Osteuropäische Fragen an eine Europäische Geschichte und Europäische Einigung: Zwei Essays, München 2007 (Forost Arbeitspapier 41). URL: http://www.forost.lmu.de/index2.html [2021-03-22]

Wergin, Ulrich et al. (eds.): Bilder des Ostens in der deutschen Literatur, Würzburg 2009.

Werner, Michael / Zimmermann, Bénédicte: Vergleich, Transfer, Verflechtung: Der Ansatz der Histoire croisée und die Herausforderung des Transnationalen, in: Geschichte und Gesellschaft 28 (2002), pp. 607–636. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40185909 / URL: http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/resolveppn/?PID=PPN483856525_0028|log38 [2021-03-22]

Wiederkehr, Stefan: Die eurasische Bewegung: Wissenschaft und Politik in der russischen Emigration der Zwischenkriegszeit und im postsowjetischen Russland, Cologne 2007.

Wingfield, Nancy (ed.): Creating the Other: Ethnic Conflict and Nationalism in Habsburg Central Europe, West Lafayette 2003. URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1x76dp7 [2021-03-22]

Wippermann, Wolfgang: Die Deutschen und der Osten: Feindbild und Traumland, Darmstadt 2007.

Wolff, Larry: Die Erfindung Osteuropas: Von Voltaire zu Voldemort, in: Karl Kaser et al. (eds.): Europa und die Grenzen im Kopf, Klagenfurt 2003 (Wieser Enzyklopädie des europäischen Ostens 11), pp. 21–34.

Wolff, Larry: Inventing Eastern Europe: The Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment, Stanford 1994. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.05073 [2021-03-22]

Zernack, Klaus: Osteuropa: Eine Einführung in seine Geschichte, Munich 1977. URL: http://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00107867-4 [2021-03-22]

Notes

1. ^{^} On the "spatial turn" in history and the cultural sciences, see: Schlögel, Im Raume 2003, in particular pp. 60–71; Gotthard, Spatial Turn 2005, pp. 15–49; Döring, Spatial Turn 2008.
2. ^{^} Tolman, Cognitive Maps 1948. On the historical roots of interdisciplinary orientation research, see: Wagner, Kognitiver Raum 2010, pp. 234–249.
3. ^{^} In addition to Edward C. Tolman, the architect and urban planner Kevin A. Lynch (1918–1984) is considered a founding father of interdisciplinary mental maps research. See: Lynch, The Image 1960. Geographical mental maps research primarily pursued the aim of contributing to the better understanding of space-related behaviour and action by means of the analysis of cognitive maps. For a critical discussion, see: Hard, Der Spatial Turn 2008, p. 288.
4. ^{^} Downs / Stea, Maps in Minds 1977, p. 6.
5. ^{^} For a definition with a somewhat different emphasis, see: Portugali, Introduction 1996, p. 1.
6. ^{^} Downs / Stea, Maps in Minds 1977, p. 6.
7. ^{^} Johnston, Mental Maps 1971, pp. 63–72; Gould / White, Mental Maps 1992. In the 1970s, the term "mental maps" was often used in geographical research to refer to the cognitive equivalent of (supposedly exact) "real" maps, and research sought to identify the discrepancies between these mental representations and the "actual" spatial environment. For a critical discussion of this topic, see: Hartmann, Konzepte 2005, p. 8.
8. ^{^} Downs and Stea had already pointed out that they use the term "map" to describe a "functional analogy": "Wir richten unsere Aufmerksamkeit in erster Linie auf die kognitive Repräsentation, die zwar die Funktion der üblichen geographischen Karte teilt, aber nicht notwendigerweise die gegenständlichen Merkmale einer solchen zeichnerischen Darstellung aufweist." ("We direct our attention primarily at the cognitive representation, which shares the function of the ordinary geographical map, but which does not necessarily exhibit the objective characteristics of such a diagrammatic representation." transl. by N.W., Downs / Stea / Linde / Labov, Raum 1985, p. 22).
9. ^{^} See: Lynch, The Image 1960.
10. ^{^} Kitchin / Blades, The Cognition 2001, pp. 1f.
11. ^{^} See: Conrad, Mental Maps 2002; Barth-Scalmani / Scharr, Mental Maps 2004, pp. 203–224; Götz, Die Ordnung 2006; Casey, Two World Wars 2008; Osterhammel, Die Verwandlung 2009, pp. 143–154; Torma, Turkestan Expeditionen 2011, pp. 45–51; Brunnbauer, "Europa" 2005, pp. 1f.; Martin, The French Colonial Mind 2011, vol. 1; Casey, Early Cold War Era 2011.
12. ^{^} See: Wagner, Kognitiver Raum 2010, p. 245.
13. ^{^} Kitchin, Cognitive Maps 1994, p. 2.
14. ^{^} For a summary of this, see: Schenk, Mental Maps 2002, pp. 493–514.
15. ^{^} Wagner, Kognitiver Raum 2010, p. 245.
16. ^{^} Wagner, Kognitiver Raum 2010, p. 247.
17. ^{^} For example, see: Wolff, Inventing Eastern Europe 1994; Todorova, Erfindung des Balkans 1998.
18. ^{^} Langenohl, Mental Maps 2005, p. 67.
19. ^{^} Langenohl, Mental Maps 2005, pp. 59f.
20. ^{^} For example, see: Dipper, Kartenwelten 2006; Kivelson, Cartographies 2006; Petronis, Constructing Lithuania 2007; Happel, Osteuropa 2010; Kamusella, School Historical Atlases 2010, pp. 113–138; Koller, Karten 2010; Lotz, Die anspruchsvollen Karten 2011; Schraut, Kartierte Nationalgeschichte 2011.
21. ^{^} Schenk, The Historical Regions 2004, pp. 15–24. On the concept of the "historical region", see: Troebst, "Historical Meso-Region" 2012.
22. ^{^} See: Todorova, Erfindung des Balkans 1998. Todorova's criticism was directed – among other things – at the exclusion and stigmatization of Southeastern Europe by historians like Jenö Szücs (1928–1988) and Peter Hanák (1921–1997).
23. ^{^} Sundhaussen, Europa balcanica 1999, pp. 626–653; Sundhaussen, Der Balkan 2003, pp. 642–658. On the "Todorova-Sundhaussen debate", see: Müller, Southeastern Europe 2003, pp. 393–408; Bethke, Von der gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung 2007, p. 21.
24. ^{^} The histoire croisée approach attempts to reflect and weaken the normative assumption of every historical comparison. See: Werner / Zimmermann, Vergleich 2002, pp. 607–636.
25. ^{^} Sundhaussen / Schmitt, Die Wiederentdeckung des Raumes 2005, pp. 13–33; Todorova, Der Balkan 2002, pp. 470–492; Todorova, Historische Vermächtnisse 2003, pp. 227–252; Todorova, Spacing Europe 2005, pp. 59–78; Troebst, "Historical Meso-Region" 2012.
26. ^{^} In addition to the titles listed in my literature review of 2002 (see: Schenk, Mental Maps 2002), the following are a selection of the subsequent publications on the construction of the "east" and "Eastern Europe": Neumann, Uses of the Other 1999; Adamovsky, Euro-Orientalism 2006; Arnason, Historians 2006; Thum, Traumland Osten 2006; Wippermann, Die Deutschen 2007; Wendland, Wie wir die Karten lesen 2007; Hösch, Samuel Huntington 2007; Bernhardt, Einbildung 2009; Wergin, Bilder des Ostens 2009; Liulevicius: The German Myth 2009; Gebhard, Das Prinzip "Osten" 2010; Happel, Osteuropa 2010; Lorenz, Konzept Osteuropa 2011.
27. ^{^} See: "Osteuropa", Brockhaus 2006, pp. 584f.; and Britannica Online Encyclopedia 2012.
28. ^{^} Art. "Osteuropa", Brockhaus 2006, pp. 584f. (author's emphasis) ("In general geographical usage", "countries in the east of Europe, i.e., Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, and the European part of Russia", "territories to the east of the (historical) border of the German-speaking territory without any regional or ethnic distinctions", transl. by N.W.). The recommendation of the Ständiger Ausschuss für geographische Namen ("Permanent Committee for Geographical Names") was that the three Baltic republics should be assigned to eastern central Europe. See: Jordan, Großgliederung Europas 2005, pp. 162–173.
29. ^{^} See: United Nations Statistics Division, Composition of Macro Geographical (Continental) Regions 2012.
30. ^{^} See: Central Intelligence Agency, Central Asia 2012.
31. ^{^} See: European Union, External Action 2012.
32. ^{^} Zernack, Osteuropa 1977; Kappeler, Osteuropäische Geschichte 2001, pp. 198–265.
33. ^{^} "Osteuropa", Brockhaus 2006, pp. 584f.
34. ^{^} See: Maxwell, Introduction 2011, pp. 1–32.
35. ^{^} Neumann, Russia 1996. See the section on "Russland" in: Schulze Wessel, "Westen; Okzident" 2004, cols. 667–672.
36. ^{^} See: Prochorov, "Vostok" 1971, pp. 388f. Additionally, Russian / Soviet encyclopedias contain entries for "Vostokovedenie" (eastern studies), "Vostochnaia voina" (Crimean War, literally "Eastern War"), "Vostochnii vopros" (eastern question), "Vostochno-Evropeiskaia platforma" (the eastern European [tectonic] plate), but no entry for "vostochnaia Evropa" ("Eastern Europe").
37. ^{^} See: Schelting, Russland und Europa 1997; Tschižewskij / Groh, Europa und Russland 1959; Danilevskij, Russland und Europa 1965.
38. ^{^} On the development of the Europe discourse in the "Eastern Bloc" during the Cold War, see: Thum, "Europa" 2003, pp. 379–395; Faraldo, Europa im Ostblock 2008. On the ideas of the Eurasian movement, see: Wiederkehr, Eurasische Bewegung 2007; Bassin, Classical Eurasianism; Bassin, Eurasianism "Classical" and "Neo" 2008.
39. ^{^} See: Orlinski, Ex oriente horror 2006, pp. 132–152. For a humorous discussion of Eastern European stereotypes, see the fictitious travel guide: Cilauro, Molwanien 2005.
40. ^{^} On the following, see: Lemberg, Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs 1985, pp. 48–91.
41. ^{^} See: Lemberg, Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs 1985, passim. The first occurrence of the term "Eastern Europe" in a book title was apparently a book by the Swedish linguist Johann Erich Thunmann (1746–1778). See: Thunmann, Untersuchungen 1774.
42. ^{^} Lemberg, Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs 1985, p. 90.
43. ^{^} Lemberg, Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs 1985, pp. 62ff.
44. ^{^} Lemberg, Zur Entstehung des Osteuropabegriffs 1985, pp. 80–82.
45. ^{^} See: Klug, Das "asiatische" Russland 1987, pp. 265–289; Mervaud / Roberti, Une infinie brutalité 1991; Poe, "A People Born to Slavery" 2000.
46. ^{^} Larry Wolff provides this dating in his study: Wolff, Inventing Eastern Europe 1994. For a summary of his argumentation, see: Wolff, Die Erfindung Osteuropas 2003, pp. 21–34.
47. ^{^} See: Wolff, Inventing Eastern Europe 1994.
48. ^{^} For a critical appraisal of Wolff's adaptation of the argument in Said, Orientalism 1979, see: Adamovsky, Euro-Orientalism 2005, pp. 592ff.
49. ^{^} Wolff, Inventing Eastern Europe 1994, p. 165.
50. ^{^} See: Liulevicius, German Myth 2009; Jureit, Ordnen von Räumen 2012.
51. ^{^} See: Adamovsky, Euro-Orientalism 2005, pp. 592–594; Lewis / Wigen, The Myth of Continents 1997, p. 229; see also the summary of the early discussion in: Schenk, Mental Maps 2002, pp. 500f., and Drace-Francis, A Provincial Imperialist 2006, p. 61.
52. ^{^} For a critical appraisal of the thesis of continuity in the Western concept of "Eastern Europe" from Voltaire to Churchill, see: Confino, Re-Inventing the Enlightenment 1994, p. 522.
53. ^{^} Struck, Nicht West 2006.
54. ^{^} Dupcsik, Postcolonial Studies 1999, pp. 1–14; Drace-Francis, Towards a Natural History 2008, p. 5.
55. ^{^} Adamovsky, Euro-Orientalism 2005, p. 608. See also: Adamovsky, Euro-Orientalism 2006.
56. ^{^} Alex Drace-Francis suggests that the following works are influenced by Wolff's Inventing Eastern Europe: Jezernik, Wild Europe 2004; Bisaha, Creating East 2004; Wingfield, Creating the Other 2003. See also: Drace-Francis, A Provincial Imperialist 2006, p. 82, footnote 2.
57. ^{^} A similar list of questions forms the basis of the interdisciplinary research project "European Regions and Boundaries: A Conceptual History", which is coordinated by the Centre for Advances Studies in Sofia and Diana Mishkova (*1958) and Balázs Trencsény (*1973) in Budapest.